[Torg] Another round of magic questions

[Jerry S Fisk]

At 01:43 AM 12/16/2008, Chris wrote:
>I didn't think the mage in the example from the original post was 
>disconnected. Though maybe I'm missing some crucial piece of 
>contextual information. Other than that, I have nothing to add to 
>this discussion. But under the impression that the mage is not 
>disconnected, the rules on 212 would apply and the rules on 207 would be moot.

Indeed you are correct Chris.  The mage was not disconnected in the 
original post.  I was merely asking if a Magic Axiom 12 could cast a 
spell with a higher Axiom and what contradiction it would cause.  As 
for the rules on 207 I will have to look them over more carefully then.

Either way the mage would cause a contradiction check either once or 
twice.  However this whole discussion is moot if the mage actually 
has a spell chip.  In my "Magical Datablocks"  message I state I 
found a passage in the TKSB that allows a techno mage to cast an 
impressed spell with out any contradictions.

Oh well.  Thanks and have a happy holiday.