[Torg] Tharkold and Kadandra
Kansas Jim
ksjim at sdc.org
Thu Jan 3 21:23:52 EST 2008
Smooge writes:
>> It's not a problem for the Star Sphere so other cosms should be
>> able to have multiple populated solar systems. The Tharkold/
> Well the cosm was engineered to be accepting to all other world-laws.
> It seemed to be specifically made so that you could plop in a world
> and it would be 'ok man' until enough generations had occurred that it
> would just accept the norm, maann.
But just WLs, not axioms. The LoAcceptance doesn't say that there
won't be reality clashes, just that you can use foreign WLs in
the Star Sphere without it causing a contradiction. I think dropping
a different reality into the Star Sphere would create the same
reality backlash that it would create anywhere else.
>> Well, the Land Below worked that way so there's precedent. But it's
>> a precedent that I'd prefer to ignore. :)
> Why... it makes it easier on the GM to have multiple worlds in a cosm
> just have the world laws different. I would say it fits Occam's razor.
It's not necessary for multiple worlds in one cosm to have different WLs
any more than multiple cultures in one cosm should have different WLs.
That's how I see the razor slicing things. Different WLs mean different
realities to me, and by definition you can't have multiple realities
naturally existing within a cosm.
--
Kansas Jim, Torg guru (ksjim (at) sdc (dot) org)
Torg website: http://www.sdc.org/~ksjim/index.html
More information about the Torg
mailing list