[Torg] How precise is focusing?

[Stephen John Smoogen]

 On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 12:37 AM, Dominick Riesland wrote: > I am fully
cognizant of the ability of the gamemaster to adjust these > as needed for
the campaign. I was wondering, though, if anyone can > show the intent of
the magic designers with regard to how specific > focusing a spell is for
purposes of the Principle of Definition. A few > examples: > > 1) A knight
with Enchant Armor (alteration/inanimate forces) is struck > by Lightning
(also alteration/inanimate forces). Does the enchantment > force a check on
the Principle of Definition? I think so... but will defer to people who have
looked at the rules more recenlty. > 2) This time, the magician has the
Enchant Armor on her own armor and > casts Lightning. Lightning has a
duration of 40 seconds, during which > time, the spell is nominally still on
the caster. Does the enchantment > force a check on the Principle of
Definition? > > 3) A magician attempts to cast the Major Eraser on a
character > carrying a bow with Enchant Bow on it. Does the Major Eraser
attack > the bow? Not sure.. > 4) Ten daggers with Keen Blade
(alteration/metal) on them are placed > in the same enchanted metal pouch.
Does this cause any problems? Not in my view. They are seperate objects. >
Dominick Riesland, aka Rabbitball > Creator of the Cosmversal Grimoire >
"There are always possibilities, my sergeant told me. But he never had > his
possibilities torn away like wings from a fly." >
_______________________________________________ > Torg mailing list >
Torg at justintimeadventures.com >
http://www.justintimeadventures.com/mailman/listinfo/torg > -- Stephen J
Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux How far that little candle throws his beams! So
shines a good deed in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of
Venice"
[]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.justintimeadventures.com/pipermail/torg/attachments/20090702/ff649cfc/attachment.html>