[TORG] Is it worth maintaining the "Additional" state path cost?

[Jones Jasyn]

On Jul 27, 2009, at 7:41 AM, Dominick Riesland wrote:

>  But recently I started questioning the rules themselves and
> how necessary they are.

That happened to me, as well.

[...]

> The rules for building the additional
> path are confusing and seemingly contradictory

Most of the State Path rules are confusing, ill-defined, and  
contradictory. (Not a singular trait among Torg rules.)  Additionally,  
the state path isn't crafted with an eye towards balance. Spells with  
very minor effects can have high State Path costs, spells which  
disintegrate castles a very low State cost. It is a mess, IMHO.

I got rid of the State Path altogether. You can do as you wish of  
course, but it is, at least, an option worth considering.

Jasyn Jones
jasynj (at) gmail (dot) com

"To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield."
Ulysses, Alfred Lord Tennyson