[TORG] Is it worth maintaining the "Additional" state path cost?

[Jones Jasyn]

On Jul 27, 2009, at 8:26 AM, Phil Dack wrote:

> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: Jones Jasyn jasynj at gmail.com
>>
>> Most of the State Path rules are confusing, ill-defined, and  
>> contradictory.

[...]

>> I got rid of the State Path altogether. You can do as you wish of  
>> course, but it
>> is, at least, an option worth considering.
>
> I have to agree with the simplicity. I happen to like state paths,  
> but they need much stricter definition as to what each path can do  
> and what it brings either as a Pattern, Mechanism or Result.

I like the flavor myself. The State Path was cool and colorful. I  
haven't thought about it enough to explain why, but it was just  
neat... in concept. Like so much of Torg.  Pity about the mechanics...

Jasyn Jones
jasynj (at) gmail (dot) com

"To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield."
Ulysses, Alfred Lord Tennyson