[TORG] Is it worth maintaining the "Additional" state path cost?

[Kansas Jim]

Dominick Riesland wrote:

> The Aysle Sourcebook (and Pixaud's) state that spells that are
> impressed into someone or something other than the caster have an
> additional state path to impress the spell into the alternate
> location. Is this complication necessary? To begin with, any spell
> that is impressed into something other than the caster will almost
> always also be focused on that object (which provides a combined
> addition to the state path cost of 5), or else is a ward (which also
> adds 5 to the state path cost). The rules for building the additional

While it's a nice bit of flavor, as is the whole state path concept,
changing it to a flat cost ala focused and wards would certainly make
things a lot simpler and avoid additional confusions.

-- 
Kansas Jim, Torg guru (ksjim (at) sdc (dot) org)
Torg website: http://www.sdc.org/~ksjim/index.html