[Torg] Why 0-21? (was: The Magic Axiom Chart, 4 of 9)

[Travis James Hall]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: torg-bounces at justintimeadventures.com 
> [mailto:torg-bounces at justintimeadventures.com] On Behalf Of 
> Jasyn Jones
> Sent: Saturday, 20 February 2010 2:05 PM
> To: torg at justintimeadventures.com
> Subject: Re: [Torg] Why 0-21? (was: The Magic Axiom Chart, 4 of 9)
> 
> On Feb 19, 2010, at 7:36 PM, Travis James Hall wrote:
> 
> >> Jasyn Jones
> >> 
> >> I'm not saying people have to do it my way. My way, Ks. Jim's 
> >> way, Dave Oakes way, Travis Hall's way, Dominick's way, 
> >> whoever's way: I'm for whichever way is better.
> > 
> > No, Jasyn, you're for whichever way is better *by your 
> > personal criteria*. You are for your own preference.
> 
> So is everyone else.

I'm not talking about the commentators right now. I'm talking about you.

> > What you are failing to acknowledge is that others want 
> > something different out of the axioms,
> 
> I completely disagree. And, as has always been the case 
> whenever you've made this accusation, the facts are not in 
> agreement with you:
> 
> "And in this case, cutting down the charts is better. IMNSHO."

It doesn't matter that you sometimes throw in a "IMNSHO" when you continue
to use phrasing which is or seems at odds with that acronym. Earlier, you
were asking for feedback concerning possible failures of communication. This
is that feedback.

Replace "Why Is 21 Better?" with "Why Do I Prefer 21?" (and similar changes
in approach generally) and the sort of argument you are having with Dominic
will go away.

Or you can continue having the arguments.

Travis Hall