[Torg] Why 0-21? Or why not?

[Chris]

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:30 PM, Jasyn Jones <jasynj at gmail.com> wrote:
On Feb 24, 2010, at 6:02 PM, Chris wrote:

> > The 0-21 and 0-30 variations both leave empty holes,

> Neither does.

> 0-30: http://web.me.com/stormknights/reality/tech.html

> 0-21:
http://www.justintimeadventures.com/pipermail/torg/2010-February/042099.html
(and
the next 3 messages).

I was referring to there are places where there is no cosm specifically
rated for that value, not that there are not explanations of what is
available. And the 0-30, and 0-21 I refer to belong to Dom and yourself
respectively.

> > and from what I read of the 0-30 in some other post, it seems that a lot
of what goes above 21 or 22, or whichever number it was is left for things
that have not been accomplished by any known cosm,

> True. The highest official Tech axiom is the Space Gods, at Tech 30.
Pulse's cosm (IU#3) had a Tech 32, but that cosm was never described in
detail.

I was referring to the mention Dom made that he does not have any current
cosm go above 22, which I think he said was the Star Sphere, though uses a
0-30 chart. And your current chart does not go above 21 at all, so all cosms
fit in 0-22 for what exists. Dom's extends beyond for undiscovered cosms, or
what have you, and yours leaves little room beyond the Star Sphere. Those
are personal choices, but they are not that far off in their actual
representations, really, if we avoid specifics.

-chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.justintimeadventures.com/pipermail/torg/attachments/20100225/80e6b97d/attachment.html>